The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is the screening instrument most commonly used to identify women with postpartum mood disorders. Â This is a 10-item questionnaire which has been validated in many different populations and is available in almost every language. On this scale, a score of 10 or greater or an affirmative answer on question 10 (presence of suicidal thoughts) is suggestive of postpartum depression. Â (Setting the cut-off score of 12 improves the specificity of the EPDS for identifying major depression; however, the sensitivity falls off significantly, making it less useful for the purposes of screening.) Â Most importantly it should be emphasized that an elevated score on the EPDS does not necessarily confirm the diagnosis of postpartum depression; this requires a more thorough diagnostic evaluation.
A recent study indicated that the EPDS may be further abbreviated to a three question version which can be used to screen for postpartum depression. Â Given the prevalence of anxiety symptoms among women with postpartum depression, the authors honed done the EPDS, creating a screening tool comprised of the 3 items which comprise the anxiety subscale of the EPDS:
- Â I have blamed myself unnecessarily when things went wrong
- Â I have been anxious or worried for no good reason
- Â I have felt scared or panicky for no very good reason
The 3-item EPDS was compared to the 10-item version in a cohort of 199 14- to 26-year-old new mothers at well-child visits during the first 6 postpartum months. Â A total of 41 mothers (20.6%) met criteria for depression (EPDS-10 score > 10). The EPDS-3 exhibited better screening performance characteristics, with a sensitivity of 95% and a negative predictive value of 98%. (The negative predictive value is the probability that subjects with a negative screening test truly don’t have the illness.) Â Interestingly, the EPDS-3 identified 16% more mothers as depressed than the EPDS-10.
Another study (presented at the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ 2016 Annual Clinical and Scientific Meeting held in May  2016 in Washington, DC) tested the EPDS-3 in a larger population of women.    Study subjects (n=914) were evaluated with the EPDS-10 as part of the screening process for perinatal depression.  A score for the EPDS-3 was calculated for each subject and adjusted in order to use the same numerical cut-off as is used for the EPDS-10.
When the EPDS-3 was used for screening, the number of women with probable depression increased by 40.1%. Furthermore, when the researchers looked at the subjects who were identified with probable depression using the EPDS-10, all were identified using the EPDS-3 score.
So when it comes to the EPDS for screening, it looks as if less is more. Â
Ruta Nonacs, MD PhD
Kabir K, Sheeder J, Kelly LS. Identifying postpartum depression: are 3 questions as good as 10? Pediatrics 2008; Â Sep;122(3): e696-702.
Bodenlos KL, Maranda L, Deligiannidis KM. Comparison of the Use of the EPDS-3 vs. EPDS-10 to Identify Women at Risk for Peripartum Depression. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2016; May 127: 89S-90S.
